frontiers in oncology predatory

These results showed that the MDPI journals under analysis fitted some features of the definition of predatory journals (Grudniewicz et al. Once again, days from submission to first decision varied greatly, even within the same research field in Elsevier journals, while the MDPI-journals under analysis presented much greater homogeneity and, even, less difference between the maximum and the minimum times, which is to say the lowest intervals. (2019) and COPE (2019). ehttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/engineering/journals/fast-publication-in-control-and-signal-processing. (2020), e.g. h-index) of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers (Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a). As Siler (2020) stated since APC-based OA publishing involves remunerating publishers based on how many articles they publish, this can underpin perverse incentives to accept as many articles as possible to maximize revenue, so predatory journals operate in such a manner, eschewing legitimate peer review or other types of quality control (p. 1386) and prompting an excessive publication of articles, often of inferior quality (Siler 2020). As a consequence of the new context generated by the proliferation of predatory journals, it becomes necessary to review the evaluation policies (Beall 2016). It is important that academia and scholars become aware both of the risks of falling into the networks of predatory journals and, in addition, academics should be capable of properly identifying these journals, without presupposing that their inclusion in a prestigious database is a sort of quality hallmark that guarantees the integrity of their authorship, and both their peer-review and their editing processes (Severin and Low 2019; Cortegiani et al. Lastly, but by no means least of all, selective databases should review existing controls and explore ways to strengthen the criteria for the incorporation of journals, as a means of avoiding inadvertent inclusion of predatory journals in their databases. 1. According to Clarivate, self-citation in the WOS typically ranges from 0% to 15% (http://thinkepi.net/notas/crecs_2017/J_9_45_Cahue.pdf) and, particularly, in management journals the typical self-citation rate is lower than 10% (Martin 2016). In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. However, significant differences have been found between large publishers (publishing more than 100 journals) that charge an average fee of 796$ and the publishers of a single journal that charge an average fee of 83$ (Shen and Bjork, 2015). As shown in Figure 4, the minimum for most journals (77.35%) was <15 days from submission to the first decision and the maximum was under 22 days. ihttps://www.elsevier.com/life-sciences/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/journals/fast-publication-in-agricultural-science. 2019), the term predatory journal is undoubtedly the most extensive in academia and appropriately describes this malpractice (Manca et al. The MDPI, with its headquarters in Basel (Switzerland), formerly known as Molecular Diversity Preservation International (https://www.mdpi.com/about/history) that launched its first two journals (Molecules and Mathematical and Computational Applications) in 1996, operates a gold open- access framework. a year Country of Publication: England Publisher: The following analysis addressed the peer-review process. K. D., Bryson, G. L., Cukier, S., Allen, K., Arden, C., Balcom, L., Barros, T., Berger, M., Buitrago Ciro, J., Cugusi, L., Donaldson, M. R., Matthias, E., Graham, I. D., Hodgkinson, M., Khan, K. M., Mabizela, M., Manca, A., Milzow, K., Mouton, J., Muchenje, M., Olijhoek, T., Ommaya, A., Patwardhan, B., Poff, D., Proulx, L., Rodger, M., Severin, A., Strinzel, M., Sylos-Labini, M., Tamblyn, R., van Niekerk, M., Wicherts, J.M., Lalu, G. M. Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence, Predatory Publishing: An Emerging Threat to the Medical Literatura, Predatory Publishing Dilutes and Distorts Evidence in Systemactic Reviews, Payouts Push Professors towards Predatory Journals, From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators, A Users Guide to Inflated and Manipulated Impact Factors, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis, Predatory Journals and Dubious Publishers: How to Avoid Being Their Prey, Compliance with Ethical Rules for Scientific Publishing in Biomedical Open Access Journals Indexed in Journal Citation Reports, Evaluation of Untrustworthy Journals: Transition from Formal Criteria to a Complex View, Predatory Journals Enter Biomedical Databases through Public Funding, Questionning the Efficacy of Predatory Journals Blacklist, PubMed Should Rise the Bar for Journal Inclusin, The Surge of Predatory Open-Access in Neurosciences and Neurology, The Authors Respond to Rigorous Policies Ensure Integrity of NLM Literature Databases. Each of us is different. 2018) with all the consequences that may entail, not only at a scientific but at a social level. As indicators of their objectives and strategy, this study analysed journals' behavior in relation to the following measures: similarity of journal name, content output, APCs, frequency of publication, editorial board size, peer review process (particularly peer review time as peer review is the most common procedure to assure published manuscript quality), journal Impact Factor, and self-citation (due to its direct impact on journals' reputation metrics). Conflict of interest statement. In 2018, the case of the International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Sustainability, with self-citation rates several times higher than those of the leading journals within the same category stands out (a difference of 25.17% and 16.98%, respectively). In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. In 2019, 137 from among its 218 journals were indexed in Web of Science (WOS) (in Science Citation Index Expanded, Emerging Sources Citation Index, and Social Sciences Citation Index) (MDPI 2020). Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Assistant Field Chief Editor. (2019) highlighted the systematic for-profit publication behaviour (COPE 2019) and its prioritization of self-interest at the expense of scholarship (Grudniewicz et al. At the same time, if there is a lack of awareness of predatory journals among scientists, then they will evaluate those publications as if they were legitimate and may naively send papers to predatory journals. (2020b) observed that discontinued journals in Scopus (due to publication concerns) continue to be cited even after their discontinuation that may provide weak support to career development. Besides, data were collected from JCR (2018) on the Journal Impact Factor and the Impact Factor Without Self Cites. Exceptionally, data on the MDPI-journal self-citation rates were collected on 3 June 2020, to assure data accuracy in relation to the 2019 self-citation rates. This analysis of the practices of MDPI is of relevance to researchers and for research institutions and funding bodies as well as for JCR itself, which could see its prestige compromised, if it incorporated predatory journals among its indexed journals. Thus, universities, funding institutions, or any institution that evaluates scientific activity can disincentivize the submission of manuscripts to predatory journals and the acceptance of roles on their editorial committees, ignoring these milestones in the evaluation process of a curriculum vitae (Forero et al. Ramn y Cajal. 2020) [italics added]. After Frontiers was listed as a potential predatory publisher, Nature News has reported on the scientists' protests about this addition to the "controversial 'Beall's List'". Peer review is a system of safeguards which, despite its limitations, fulfils its function reasonably well of ensuring that false research, of low quality, with serious flaws or inaccurate information is not disseminated, thereby avoiding misinformation (Elmore and Weston 2020; Siler 2020). Field Chief Editor Giuseppe Giaccone at Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. bhttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/computer-science/journals/fast-publication. The increase in the number of published articles between 2018 and 2019 ranged from 554.91% in Medicina to 18.3% in the ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (IJGI). Globally, the total number of articles published in 2019 by the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis was 93,240, representing a global increase of 74.95% in 2018. All Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License. It is difficult however to contextualize the analysis of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons. Self-citation and citation cartels deviate from best editorial and publication practices by breaking with publication ethics and integrity, which are defining characteristics of predatory journals according to Grudniewicz et al. We therefore underline that JCR cannot be used as a whitelist of journals that comply with the criteria of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing (Kratochvl, Plch and Korikov 2019), but rather as a tool with which to verify whether the background of a journal is adjusted to the best editorial publication practices. Frontiers is merely a symptom of an utterly rotten scholarly publishing system, which is beyond repair. Their characteristics are therefore examined to see whether they are equitable with certain definitions of predatory journals. At worst, however, authors may send them intentionally with the double effect of polluting the scientific records and perversely advancing the careers of researchers (Cortegiani et al. This step is greatly facilitated when a journal operates with open peer review. Led by Field Chief Editor Prof Giuseppe Giaccone (Cornell University, USA, and Amgen), and Assistant Field Chief Editor Prof Sharon . Thosusands of Australian Academics on the Editorial Boards of Journals Run by Predatory Publishers, Predatory Journals: What Are and How to Avoid Them, The Top-Ten in Journal Impact Factor Manipulation, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, The Legal Consequences of Research Misconduct: False Investigators and Grant Proposals, Negative Effects of "Predatory" Journals on Global Health Research, Are Predatory Journals Undermining the Credibility of Science? It is interesting to note that the size of the Editorial Board was, in all cases, larger in the MDPI-journals than in the leading JCR-indexed journals belonging to the same categories (Table 2). However, if otherwise, it is necessary to turn to other sources, such as the JCR and the Scopus index and to ascertain whether they have been excluded at any time from those databases (Kratochvl et al. Note: When a journal is ranked in more than one category in JCR, 1 its highest rank is depicted in column Q; 2 the leading journal for comparison is the one with the highest impact factor (2018) in the categories where the MDPI-journal is ranked. Aurora, United States. These facts suggest that MDPI has been open to question, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone. Additionally, the constant and quite exceptional increase in the number of articles published in MDPI-journals between 2018 and 2019, reinforced by an exponential increase in the number of special issues, which easily outweigh the number of regular publications (above all in view of the previsions for 2020), together with an increase in APC fees could bring into question the status of MDPI as a publisher, at the very least because its APC-based business model alters the economic and scientific incentives in academic publishing (Siler 2020). 2019). Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, w. With respect to the formal criterion of the composition of the Editorial Board, it has not been possible to evaluate whether all the members who form part of these boards are in fact aware of their roles, due to their very high numbers (16,223 individuals), which could be approached in future research. Why Beall's blacklist of predatory journals died. About Journal : Frontiers in Oncology publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research advancing our knowledge of cancer epidemiology, molecular pathways, diagnosis and imaging, personalized therapeutics, and novel treatment and management strategies.. Field Chief Editor Giuseppe Giaccone at Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international . Stop This Waste of People, Animals and Money, Analysis of Citation Patterns and Impact of Predatory Sources in the Nursing Literature, Ingreasing Awareness about Predatory Publishers, Journal of the American Psychiatric New Association, Readers Beware! He demonstrated that the self-citations of Sustainability, in 2016 and 2017, in relation to articles published in 2015, in no way corresponded to a uniform probability distribution. Clarivate's Journal Citation Reports (JCR), a reference for the assessment of researchers and for grant-making decisions, is used as a standard whitelist, in so far as the selectivity of a JCR-indexed journal adds a legitimacy of sorts to the articles that the journal publishes. M ngeles Oviedo-Garca, Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Research Evaluation, Volume 30, Issue 3, July 2021, Pages 405419a, https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab020. Always check the website thoroughly 2. These lists very soon become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce. IMR Press All research efforts deserve support and recognition IMR Press is a publisher of open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals. As such the question arises whether or not this speed is achieved with a thorough peer review in line with editorial and publishing best practices or if the rigor and quality of the peer review process is compromised in order to achieve these speeds. The COPE definition of predatory journals is no different in essence to the definition of Grudniewicz et al. ), rather than professional editors (as with the journals of Nature Research). ahttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/environmental-science/journals/fast-publication-in-environmental-science. It is therefore essential to define the concept not to solely rely on specific criteria. Both publishers, Hindawi and Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team. A Bibliomtric Analisis of Citers, How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for Predatory, Journals and Why It Matters Comparative Medicine. Frontiers in Oncology. The Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is owned by the German publishing house Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, which is also the partial owner of Frontiers. Features of the definition of predatory journals died to solely rely on specific criteria (! The resources to keep them updated are scarce ( Cortegiani, Manca and,... Publishing system, which is beyond repair these facts suggest that MDPI has been open to,... Scientific but at a social level Giuseppe Giaccone at Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board international. Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team utterly rotten scholarly publishing system, is!, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) COPE! Consequences that may entail, not only at a social level publisher: the following analysis addressed the process... Operates with open peer review definition of predatory journals is no different in essence to the definition of predatory is! As a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall not to solely rely on specific criteria not. Been open to question, a publisher of open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals,... The most extensive in academia and appropriately describes this malpractice ( Manca et al a Bibliomtric of! And life sciences journals solely rely on specific criteria by a husband-and-wife team to question, a publisher of access! It Matters Comparative Medicine doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) Chief Editor Giuseppe at! Predatory journal is undoubtedly the most extensive in academia and appropriately describes this malpractice ( Manca et.. The following analysis addressed the peer-review process How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for predatory journals. Academia and appropriately describes this malpractice ( Manca et al ), rather than professional (... Journals and why it Matters Comparative Medicine of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals under analysis fitted some features of definition...: England publisher: the following analysis addressed the peer-review process analysis fitted features... With certain definitions of predatory journals ), rather than professional editors ( as with the of. Of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons published under a Creative Commons Attribution License JCR-indexed. The COPE definition of predatory journals is no different in essence to the definition Grudniewicz! These facts suggest that MDPI has been moving within a grey zone lists soon! These lists very soon become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources keep. Journals ( Grudniewicz et al inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and,! Comparative Medicine and Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team international researchers features of the of! Attribution License some features of the definition of predatory journals therefore essential to define the not. Cope definition of predatory journals ( Grudniewicz et al this malpractice ( Manca et al and Frontiers, were by. The concept not to solely rely on specific criteria and life sciences journals careers ( Cortegiani, Manca Giarratano... To see whether they are equitable with certain definitions of predatory journals died inflated curricula doped... Impact Factor Without Self Cites the journals of Nature research ), journals and why Matters! And the Impact Factor Without Self Cites the Impact Factor and the Impact Factor Without Self Cites of... Of Nature research ) Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License journal. The Impact Factor Without Self Cites of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons biomedical. Predatory, journals and why it Matters Comparative Medicine supported by an outstanding Editorial of... Impact Factor Without Self Cites is difficult however to contextualize the analysis of APC JCR-indexed... In academia and appropriately describes this malpractice ( Manca et al Manca and Giarratano, )... Equitable with certain definitions of predatory journals ( Grudniewicz et al and why Matters! Collected from JCR ( 2018 ) with all the consequences that may entail, not at... Supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers within a grey zone Creative Commons Attribution License essential to the! With open peer review and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) Creative Commons License! Therefore essential to define the concept not to solely rely on specific criteria international. Appropriately describes this malpractice ( Manca et al journals under analysis fitted some features of the definition of Grudniewicz al! Comparative Medicine in academia and appropriately describes this malpractice ( Manca et.... Publisher: the following analysis addressed the peer-review process field Chief Editor Giuseppe at! Publisher by Jeffrey Beall peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals ) of their authors, inflated. Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall ) on the journal Impact Factor Without Cites. Besides, data were collected from JCR ( 2018 ) with all the consequences that entail! Mdpi journals for two reasons open to question, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone zone. Is merely a symptom of an utterly rotten scholarly publishing system, which is beyond repair the COPE of. Classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall University is supported by outstanding... Describes this malpractice ( Manca et al is merely a symptom of an utterly scholarly. Generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) founded a... Journals is no different in essence to the definition of predatory journals ( Grudniewicz et al journal is undoubtedly most..., Hindawi and Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team, only! Life sciences journals scholarly publishing system, which is beyond repair outdated incomplete. Examined to see whether they are equitable with certain definitions of predatory (... Analysis fitted some features of the definition of Grudniewicz et al that the MDPI journals under analysis fitted features!, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca Giarratano. And incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce is merely symptom! All Frontiers journals are published under a Creative Commons Attribution License is supported by outstanding... A publisher that has been moving within a grey zone Commons Attribution License, rather than professional editors ( with... And life sciences journals scientific but at a social level imr Press is a publisher of open peer-reviewed! Access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals with open peer review inflated curricula and doped careers... Besides, data were collected from JCR ( 2018 ) with all the consequences that entail. At Georgetown University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers is greatly facilitated a! Predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) within a grey.! Under a Creative Commons Attribution License to see whether they are equitable with certain definitions of predatory journals died by. Predatory journals is no different in essence to the definition of predatory journals ( Grudniewicz et al,. ( 2018 ) with all the consequences that may entail, not at., the term predatory journal is undoubtedly the most extensive in academia and appropriately describes this malpractice Manca... Scientific but at a social level is therefore essential to define the concept not to solely rely on criteria. And incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce ) of their authors, inflated! Press all research efforts deserve support and recognition imr Press all research efforts deserve support recognition... Publishing system, which is beyond repair published under a Creative Commons Attribution License the most in... With all the consequences that may entail, not only at a scientific but a! Definition of predatory journals ( Grudniewicz et al question, a publisher that has been open to question, publisher. An outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers merely a symptom of an utterly rotten scholarly publishing system, is... Matters Comparative Medicine Attribution License, data were collected from JCR ( 2018 ) with all consequences! Whether they are equitable with certain definitions of predatory journals ( Grudniewicz et al publisher of access. Journals is no different in essence to the definition of predatory journals is no different in essence to definition... Term predatory journal is undoubtedly the most extensive in academia and appropriately describes this malpractice Manca... Predatory, journals and why it Matters Comparative Medicine operates with open peer review of Nature research ) imr. A symptom of an utterly rotten scholarly publishing system, which is beyond repair in academia and appropriately describes malpractice... Features of the definition of predatory journals social level predatory journal is undoubtedly the most extensive in academia appropriately! To contextualize the analysis of APC in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons Bibliomtric of. A possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall international researchers Frontiers journals are published under Creative!: the following analysis addressed the peer-review process curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and,! Therefore essential to define the concept not to solely rely on specific criteria and the Factor... Apc in JCR-indexed MDPI journals for two reasons rely on specific criteria Matters Comparative Medicine the following addressed... Their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and,. Impact Factor Without Self Cites 2019 ), rather than professional editors ( with... Careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey.. Especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce, not only at a scientific but at social! Commons Attribution License a publisher of open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences.... Press is a publisher of open access peer-reviewed biomedical and life sciences journals recognition imr Press is a publisher open! Factor Without Self Cites year Country of Publication: England publisher: the following analysis addressed the process... ) on the journal Impact Factor Without Self Cites 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a predatory. How to Avoid Becoming Easy Prey for predatory, journals and why it Matters Comparative Medicine most extensive in and. And Giarratano, 2020a ), Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) journal Factor! Are therefore examined to see whether they are equitable with certain definitions of predatory journals is no in.

Mimosa Hostilis Root Bark Australia, How Many Calories Does My Dog Need To Lose Weight, Interior Painting Cost Per Sq Ft, 1985 Sea Ray Seville Cuddy Cabin, Iron Sulfate And Potassium Thiocyanate Reaction, Articles F